• @Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

    edit: went and looked it up

    Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states, “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall anyone be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.”

    • @HopingForBetter
      link
      English
      108 months ago

      I’ll gladly acknowledge the existence of a supreme being; my tuxedo cat is very supreme.

      …we don’t have to say which being is supreme, right?

    • Bahnd Rollard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      By that verbage, claiming to be pastafarian meets those requirments.

      Would pay good money to see a official painting of someone with a collander on their head.

    • @bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

      Just to be clear that’s unconstitutional. That law has no force or effect.

      Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

      • @Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, it’s unconstitutional…buuut, the shitty way our political system works, somebody would have to sue to get it removed in Texas. Until someone does, they’re going to enforce it.

        edit: in Texas

        • @bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 months ago

          The text is never going to be removed for sure because that takes action. But also no one is enforcing it either. I’d love to hear about anyone it’s been enforced against, if they exist.

          • @Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            If you think they’re not going to fight tooth and nail to enforce it in Texas, you don’t know Texas. It would probably have to go to SCOTUS.

            • @bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              I just asked who has been barred from the ballot as a result. I’m aware of Republican candidates raising the issue in TX, only to be informed that it’s unconstitutional. To my knowledge, no one has ever been barred since that case. If you have different information please let me know.

              If someone were barred, they would sue in federal district court and immediately receive an injunction. Federal courts cannot ignore precedent from SCOTUS.