• @holycrap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2011 year ago

    I think this has as much to do with Google being shit at finding stuff lately as it does llms like chatGPT

    • Calyhre
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 year ago

      You can even see the decline in posts and votes before GPT became mainstream. This definitely look more like search engine failing to get rid of those cheap copycats.

      • @zatanas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        391 year ago

        Agreed. For me, making it so that the search engine ignores -string was one of the biggest set backs.

          • @gosling@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            831 year ago

            Hyphen (-) means you don’t want to see this word, while words surrounded by quotes (") means you want these phrases exactly.

            Most symbols are also ignored, which is great for an average user but terrible for programmers.

            • @towerful@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              121 year ago

              Yeh, suddenly you need to know what the language calls the operator within the context you want to use it.
              At which point, you probably don’t need to Google the symbol!

              • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                UI-wise, though, it’s toxic, and therefore slower and more stressing. It’s something that can be fixed, and ergo essentially a bug. ;-)

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          241 year ago

          On Google and on Duck Duck Go too. On DDG you can’t get rid of the over-optimized websites anymore even if you use -“website name”. Luckily -site:address still works.

          • @cschreib@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            191 year ago

            That’s crazy. Google/DDG bloat from SEO websites had already driven me out a while ago, so I hadn’t noticed. I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now, and I find I can trust my search results again. Being able to permanently downgrade or even block a given website is an awesome feature, I would recommend it just for that.

            • @pelotron@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              10
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wait WHAT? I was just asking on discord the other day if there existed a search engine that allowed you to blacklist websites as a user setting. I need to curate out all AI written garbage from my results.

            • Hmm, not really used to the idea of paying for search, but I understand.

              Is it good at filtering AI generated sites and sites that are clearly copy pasted. Or do you kind of have to identify that yourself and manually block?

              • @Dave@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                I think it’s worth testing it with the free 100 searches. All you need is an email address (no credit card unless you’re actually subscribing). I’ve only been using it a few days but I don’t think it filters out AI generated sites. But you can set a ranking by site (block, lower, normal, raise, pin) so you can make stack overflow be priorised and block quora.

                They have a ranking board of top sites in each category so you can go through it and set the rank of a bunch of sites upfront.

              • @cschreib@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                There’s no specific AI detection at the moment, as far as I can tell. But it has “listicle” detection. If you ask “best lawn mower”, all these “the 5 best lawn mowers of 2023” websites with affiliated Amazon links get pooled into a compact Listicle section, that you can just scroll past and ignore.

    • Raltoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Don’t forget that Duck Duck Go is even worse at it now. It will literally change your results if you go back after clicking a link.

        • Raltoid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think they’re trying to implement a sort of “smart prediction” thing, where it assumes that if you go back the link you clicked wasn’t relevant. And so it tries to remove closely related results. Which works the opposite if you get two results from the same page and you click the wrong one. Which makes looking up technical or programming related issues a nightmare.

    • @Monsieur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I used to spend a lot of time on Google and stack, now I ask phind more often than not, which violates information for me.