@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 months agoSTEMmander.xyzimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1878arrow-down117
arrow-up1861arrow-down1imageSTEMmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish35•4 months ago– It’s about nothing. – No sets? – No, forget the sets. – You’ve got to have sets. – Who says you’ve got to have sets? Remember when we were talking about functions of functions? That could be a theory all by itself.
minus-square@AngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoSo they are metagaming mathematics?
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish13•4 months agoI don’t know that much of history, but by my accounts category theory is metagaming the metagame of the original mathematics metagamers.
minus-square@AngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months agoSo we’re at least 4 metas deep at this point?
minus-square@Natanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoJust wait until the infinity mathematicians shows up and starts assigning cardinalities to the level of meta
– It’s about nothing.
– No sets?
– No, forget the sets.
– You’ve got to have sets.
– Who says you’ve got to have sets? Remember when we were talking about functions of functions? That could be a theory all by itself.
So they are metagaming mathematics?
I don’t know that much of history, but by my accounts category theory is metagaming the metagame of the original mathematics metagamers.
So we’re at least 4 metas deep at this point?
Just wait until the infinity mathematicians shows up and starts assigning cardinalities to the level of meta