• @neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    208 months ago

    I read this book in college, of my own accord, and I didn’t believe everything in it, at the time, and only I encountered criticisms of it much later.

    Definitely an accessible entry into the idea of anthropology. For what it’s worth. Probably better books out there.

    • @BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      168 months ago

      I picked this up in a airport years ago. I agree it’s probably not the best anthropology book (not that I’ve read a bunch of anthropology books). But it is a very easy book to understand and an easy read which many science books arguably are not. I think that alone makes this a valuable book because it easily delivers the concept of past environmental influence on the evolution of groups. It may not be perfect but it’s readable for us normal non-sciency people and that gives us a fighting chance to ask ourselves some important questions about how we see the world.

      • @Denjin
        link
        48 months ago

        People are too quick to shit on everything in GGaS because racists have completely misrepresented the central thesis. Namely there are quirks of geography, flora and fauna that facilitate rapid development of societies, not that there’s anything inherent to the people in those societies that make them superior to any other.