• @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 months ago

    This is 100% the case for me. I’ll seek out businesses along bike routes, but more importantly, have bike parking.

    Conversely, I’ll avoid ones that make it difficult to access by bike.

    I’ll even go out of my way to pick one place over another solely based on bike access and bike parking.

    • @stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      In my city there are a lot of bicycle lanes but practically no bike racks near any businesses - and the lanes themselves avoid the main commercial streets and wind through residential neighborhoods instead.

      It’s painfully obvious the bicycle infrastructure is designed for rich yuppies exercising and not commuting or shopping. Because fuck the poors.

      • @Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        Watched a NotJustBikes video about how poor people are actually subsidizing rich neighborhoods because of how inefficient and under taxed the houses are. Suburbs actually lose North American cities tons of money, but no one wants to make walkable cities since cars own everything now.

        • @Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I don’t think that’s 100% true. I know they’re building a walkable, car fee suburb in Phoenix/mesa. And at least in my area (Southern Hamilton county Indiana) they’re building more and more multi use pathways for cyclists and pedestrians along the major roads to businesses and schools.

          You should totally pull up Google maps and select cycling routes in that area (near Carmel) and tell me what you think. It’s not just scenic trails through neighborhoods, but actually useful routes to places you want to shop or hang out.