• @loics2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    Damn, you’re shilling hard!

    I don’t want to use my phone for basic features like the offline mode, I’m not always connected to the internet on my laptop, that’s it.

    I don’t care about Apple music, and almost every streaming platform provides some kind of SDK. It doesn’t change the fact that I don’t have a Linux client, and probably never will (or at least feature-complete) because they partly use Dolby Atmos, which is a closed-source licensed format.

    And no, even on paper, tidal’s not the better option to support artists. Buy tracks on Bandcamp, buy merch and vinyl directly from artists…

    • @jul@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -58 months ago

      I’m talking in the context of streaming services here…

      Maybe you’re right with the Linux client part, but I don’t know any other streaming service that does provide one? At least Spotify and Apple Music don’t. Does it make them also not worth it? I would disagree.

      I never said tidal is the best app to support artists. In that regard there is a better option, just give them your money for free. I meant as a streaming service, quality wise and in terms of paying artists, there are no better options.

      What I didn’t like about your OP was the fact that you laid your personal opinions out and then concluded that tidal is not worth it. Doesn’t make me a shill when I answer with counterpoints.

        • @jul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          Point taken, guess I remembered it wrong. But if you take a look at the arch wiki, they say that your mentioned client is actually not official.

          This article is mainly about the semi-official, proprietary Spotify for Linux client, which is developed by Spotify’s engineers in their spare time and not actively supported by Spotify.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Your counterpoints were all basically just “your use case is different than mine therefore you are wrong”.