• @jul@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Tidal is the most popular option for audiophiles. What I also like about it is the fact that they pay artists much more fairly than other platforms. According to this, they payout $0.013 per stream on average (which means $1 per 77 streams). Because I listen to a lot of unknown artists it is important to me to be on a platform where I can support those artists much more directly.

      AFAIK Spotify only pays the overall most listened to artists like Taylor Swift etc. I canceled my Spotify subscription when Neil Young quit Spotify.

      EDIT: because this is becoming a bit popular, for anyone looking to migrate from Spotify to Tidal, I recommend this simple to use python script to migrate your playlists. And because we have a lot of Linux users here, check out tidal-hifi.

      • @accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Tidal may be most popular but the use of the lossy MQA codec for their “lossless” offerings is objectively worse than Deezer, Apple music and even Amazon Music.

        • @jul@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          He is! And I think he returned to Spotify as well. Nope, still off.

    • @kriz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      I’m thinking of switching to Tidal. I’ve had YouTube music for awhile and I like it, but I just learned they fired a huge chunk of their staff after they unionized and that pissed me off. Anybody know how their rock and jazz selection is, especially with smaller lesser known artists?

      • @jul@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I mainly listen to punk and it’s extremely hard to find bands that are not on Tidal. When I migrated my playlists to Tidal from Spotify, there was only 1 Band which didn’t exist on Tidal. But because it was only 1 song that was part of one of my playlists, I simply didn’t care. I don’t even remember which one it was. Aha, they’re called Valentiine (3 piece all-girl garage rock band from Melbourne, Australia) and they’re still not on Tidal. Still don’t care.

        Can’t speak for Jazz though.

      • @moody
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        Tidal also laid off 10% of their staff in December. Probably not union busting, at least.

    • @ominouslemon@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      If you care about sound quality, Tidal and Qobuz are the best. The rest comes down to preference, IMHO. I like Tidal’s recommendations, but I’ve also heard good things about Spotify’s and Apple’s

    • @resetbypeer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Qobuz

      EDIT: this is when you have audio quality preferences and currating like Tidal does. But in the end it’s a matter of taste. Platform A has sometimes songs and albums that platform B does not have and vice versa.

      But for your decision making, you can’t go wrong with Tidal. If you have a good dac/hifi installation, you may want to opt for hifi plus. But the lossless plain hifi subscription is perfect if you are not super sound picky and not having a above decent installation.

      EDIT EDIT:

      They are merging hifi and hifi plus to a 10.99 offering. That is actually very good value if you don’t care about the DJ part. I am even considering this to ditch my Qobuz sub.

      Haha ignore this post

    • datendefekt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      A few years ago I did listening comparisons of Amazon Music, Spotify, Deezer, Tidal and Quobuzz. At least for my ears, Tidal was way better, with engaging dynamic range and clarity. Quobuzz was just a little better, while listening to Spotify and Amazon Music was like FM radio in comparison, loud and compressed.

      Pricewise, they’re all somewhat similar. I went with Tidal because it has good quality, a good catalogue, and pays the artists better.

    • @iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Tidal’s electronic selection isn’t great, it’s why I left the platform. But if you’re into pop music, and especially hip hop, it’s got you covered.

    • @hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      I spent a few months with each of them recently.

      For me, Apple Music recommendations are by far the best. Tidal was decent but the UI was a pain and the integrations didn’t work well. Spotify had great integrations and easy device switching, but the recommendations were terrible, for me. YouTube music is the worst of the batch. Bad UI, bad recommendations, and just not a music lovers platform.

      So, I use Apple Music. For me, it is the best since the GOAT Google Play Music was retired.

      • @jul@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Interesting. For me, none of any recommendation algorithm worked decently well for me. I find new bands via following other bands (on Instagram, sadly), look at what they listen to, what bands they hang/tour/do concerts with or by asking other punks or by checking other communities.

        • @hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          It takes a month or so before recommendations start to get close to my tastes. Apple has consistently recommended either old bands I haven’t listened to in years or new bands that I end up liking. Sure, they still fail from time to time, but I listen to a very wide variety and Apple seems to be the only platform to recognize that if I’m listening to metallica, I don’t want to hear kid cudi in the same playlist