@intelshill@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 4 months agoKibbutz Be'eri rejects story in New York Times October 7 exposé: "They were not sexually abused"theintercept.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down16cross-posted to: israelicrimes@lemm.eeisraelicrimes@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.world
arrow-up188arrow-down1external-linkKibbutz Be'eri rejects story in New York Times October 7 exposé: "They were not sexually abused"theintercept.com@intelshill@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 4 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: israelicrimes@lemm.eeisraelicrimes@lemmy.worldworld@lemmy.world
minus-square@wildbus8979@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink25•4 months ago“wrong” is not how you spell “a lie”. Wrong is accidental. This is deliberate and calculated.
minus-square@Sidyctism@feddit.delinkfedilink3•4 months agoWrong is just “not right”. A lie is a knowingly wrongful statement. So it is " wrong" but most definitely also a “lie”
minus-squareOoopslinkfedilink2•4 months agoNo, wrong is simply neutral and can mean both. Which doesn’t mean you aren’t right on principle: we should be more precise and call it the lie it is.
“wrong” is not how you spell “a lie”. Wrong is accidental. This is deliberate and calculated.
and with the media as an accomplice
Wrong is just “not right”. A lie is a knowingly wrongful statement. So it is " wrong" but most definitely also a “lie”
No, wrong is simply neutral and can mean both.
Which doesn’t mean you aren’t right on principle: we should be more precise and call it the lie it is.