• @pthaloblue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    Not the case at all. I’m a big fan of bell hooks for example, but she’s not perfect. Still, she raises good points, like feminism is for everyone and that patriarchy can hurt men just as much as women.

    Internet’s an echo chamber, so it’s good to get out and just talk to real people and ask them what’s important.

    • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Feminism is too focused on women’s issues caused by men. If you want to talk true equality feminism is the wrong brand.

      The truth is a lot of men have issues with women’s actions and that gets deflected as “patriarchy” and for something for men to solve. The suddenly women are not responsible for their actions.

      Like say a women abuses a man. Feminist say “see this is the patriarchy in action. If men stopped with the patriarchy life would be better for everyone. Because then men could get help”. But when men actually try to get help they only going to get it from men. Women quite often say men don’t need it.

      • @pthaloblue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        You should check out bell hooks sometime, she talks a lot about that! It’s a misunderstanding a lot of people have that comes from hot takes.

        Despite the contemporary visionary feminist thinking that makes clear that a patriarchal thinker need not be a male, most folks continue to see men as the problem of patriarchy. This is simply not the case. Women can be as wedded to patriarchal thinking and action as men.

        from Understanding Patriarchy

        • @RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          And this here highlights a core issue, the poor choice of language used to communicate the ideas.

          Patriarchy and toxic masculinity, for example, are horrible terms for non academic conversations. The academics should have realized this long ago, and made a concerted effort to change the language into more gender neutral ones. The fact that not only has this not happened, but there is pushback on such suggestions, sort of proves the bias that does exist in this space.

          Their poor choice of labels can only be expected to lead to the type of “man bad/woman good” thought process. Because outside of very specific academic circles, that’s exactly how those terms are read. When you read “toxic masculinity” you see “bad/broken men”. When you read “patriarchy” you read “men in control”, both terms are tailor made to lead directly to ‘blame men’ ideologies.

          For a movement that, at one point, seemed very aware of & intent on changing language that reenforces old gender roles… they also seem to be fine creating and perpetuating language that actively reenforces those roles, when its men who’s roles are being reenforced.

          • @pthaloblue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            I think a lot of feminists, hooks included, were pretty fed up with the academy. Their problem was that white upper class women were setting the terms of what feminism was in a way that excluded women of color who had also worked for many generations without being recognized. She was a supporter of using the term kyriarchy, which is more neutral and includes all structures of oppression.

            That being said, I don’t think we need an academic interpretation to say fuck the patriarchy. It’s empowering! And for men too. We don’t need to wait for the correct wording to fight against it. We can be awesome allies and good to each other, because we know the systems of oppression we’re all fighting against.

      • @Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Misandry and feminism are not mutually exclusive. One issue with folks who are patriarchy poisoned is they don’t accept help on the terms equitable to the people offering it. I see this a lot in my experience as a trans person. Every now and then I encounter a former right winger who wants to be better who looks at me as kindly life preserver to use to dig themselves out of transphobic rhetoric…

        Which is great for them, self actualization for the win and all. But when they keep saying secondhand hateful shit - like supporting bathroom legislation or inferring that trans people are all child predators… That’s shit that uses up the energy I am using to keep afloat. If you set a boundry and someone keeps demanding you lower it to have “good faith” conversations at the cost of your mental health. Being placed in a position where you are suddenly the advocate for everyone of your minority is exhausting… And honestly people learn slow. They don’t want to be at fault for something so they will defend their behaviour to the bitter end and throw tantrums when you tap out… That is if they are primed to look at you as as and authority in the subject of being trans at all. When the programming they recieved is that you are delusional people are not primed to deal with your perspective as having any weight.

        The thing about feminism is that it organized. It fought other groups of women as well as men. First at the negotiation table they became embattled over and over again. When you get rape and death threats for saying “hey maybe with could have more games with female protagonists?” then you are getting abused at a mob scale. That shit changes people. Some people who are abused become hostile ad a trauma response themselves and are not in a place to offer help. It takes strength for someone coming from a place of abuse to be in a place to be a good ally to people with problems that take logical leaps to empathize with. Not everyone has that but one of the things that helps is recognizing that someone is hurt and not looking at them as being a paragon of fairness and inclusivity. Some people need safe places to retreat to and heal. Some people never actually heal well. They are not your problem. If you waste energy looking to those people as your bar for ultimate acceptance you will only become bitter.

        • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The post is very extreme. You only need one example to disprove it. It just marginalised issues and makes out they aren’t real.

          I my life, experiences from my friends and many many stories online this will happen. You want examples find them, I’m not reliviing experiences for people this treat it like a game.

          Some guy either says he doesn’t like how some women, even self described feminist, act. As they show a moment of weakness and a women uses it against then.

          (Believe it or not this is a big issue. I guess you won’t believe it or won’t care).

          Then when that is raised as an issue, women always deflect and never say it isn’t the women’s fault they say it’s mens fault for creating a system where women abuse weak men. But those men don’t get abuse from other men, this is the weird thing. Men will get abuse from women and support from men. But men are the issue.

          Now how would that go about being fixed? This is an actual issue i know to happen. When I raise an issue like that, or someone else and what someone does is think it’s funny to make a meme about how guys hate feminist, feminists can never be wrong. But never ever do women take it as an issue that women need to fix.

        • jwiggler
          link
          fedilink
          -19 months ago

          Dude’s not gonna be happy when he finds out we’re calling his argument a strawperson now lol