@floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square305fedilinkarrow-up1563arrow-down113cross-posted to: usnews@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.mlpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1550arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.com@floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square305fedilinkcross-posted to: usnews@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.mlpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareMelllvarlinkfedilinkEnglish51•4 months agoConsider the fact that there is more than one grounds for disqualification. For president, there are also age and naturalization disqualifications. Who do you think has been determining those all these years?
minus-square@KoboldCoterie@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish-33•4 months agoYou’re getting further and further away from your original, still ridiculous statement that the SCOTUS has no problem with you storming the building.
minus-squareMelllvarlinkfedilinkEnglish33•4 months agoThat is what is known as “sarcasm”. I wasn’t sincerely calling for violence against the Supreme Court, but rather drawing attention to their hypocrisy.
Consider the fact that there is more than one grounds for disqualification. For president, there are also age and naturalization disqualifications.
Who do you think has been determining those all these years?
You’re getting further and further away from your original, still ridiculous statement that the SCOTUS has no problem with you storming the building.
That is what is known as “sarcasm”. I wasn’t sincerely calling for violence against the Supreme Court, but rather drawing attention to their hypocrisy.