@GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world • 4 months agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down111cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldusnews@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1307arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.com@GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world • 4 months agomessage-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldusnews@beehaw.orgpolitics@lemmy.ml
minus-square@Dkarma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•4 months agoThat’s if he’s in office. He’s not in office.
minus-square@anticolonialist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-7•4 months agoSec 5 is the means of enforcing sec 3
minus-square@roguetrick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•edit-24 months agoThat makes no sense. Why would But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. be included in section 3 if congress has the power to enforce (or not enforce) the clause by simple majority. It’s obviously a self-executing clause.
That’s if he’s in office. He’s not in office.
Sec 5 is the means of enforcing sec 3
That makes no sense. Why would
be included in section 3 if congress has the power to enforce (or not enforce) the clause by simple majority. It’s obviously a self-executing clause.