@ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoJudge mocks X for “vapid” argument in Musk’s hate speech lawsuitarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up163arrow-down1external-linkJudge mocks X for “vapid” argument in Musk’s hate speech lawsuitarstechnica.com@ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square2fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareBaggins [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-29 months agoSo their argument is that it was forseeable that allowing hate speech on the platform would cause financial losses??? Then why the fuck did they do it?
So their argument is that it was forseeable that allowing hate speech on the platform would cause financial losses??? Then why the fuck did they do it?