@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down110cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1852arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square154fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
minus-square@frezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish16•10 months agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-square@zarenki@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish11•10 months agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.