• @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They make 5 billion a year, thats less than 2.5% of the money they make every year, it’s a rounding error to make the spreadsheets look real good to the money lenders .

    My company just let me go with a 6 figure package (x amount of pay + stocks). They could have easily kept me there for another year, but that’s not as good for the spreadsheets.

    • Cyclohexane
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      I understand that, but still, the decision is a net negative. They are merely acting based on short-sighted insights.

      • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah that was kinda my point. All that matters is what the spreadsheet looks like now. It would have probably been a net positive to keep me given they are only going to grow and spend a fortune on hiring and new stocks. That’s a different spreadsheet though, I also live in a country where it’s expensive to fire full time employees collectively, so it’s not like they are paying these kinds of sums for everyone. It’s pretty cheap to make things look good on paper.

        • @rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Yeah, their whole goal is to look good on papers and stock market. Not to grow as actual company. They would rather cripple themselves than to strengthen themselves by slow growth…

      • @moody
        link
        27 months ago

        Short term gains are king for stock value.