Biden appeared almost 10 years to the day after he was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers when he was vice president in 2014.

President Joe Biden made an appearance Monday on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” where he answered questions about topics ranging from his age and the Israel-Hamas war to the conservative conspiracy about Taylor Swift.

The interview comes almost 10 years to the day after Biden was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers, which aired on Feb. 24, 2014, when Biden was vice president. It also follows a decision this month to skip a Super Bowl interview that had a much larger audience.

During Monday’s Q&A, Biden was asked early on how he addresses voter concern over his age.

“Take a look at the other guy, he’s about as old as I am," said Biden, who at 81 is four years older than former President Donald Trump.

It’s about how old your ideas are. Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back,” Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

  • HopeOfTheGunblade
    link
    fedilink
    119 months ago

    Maybe he should’ve. It looked like a settled issue at that point with the duration of precedent. It might have been better if he did, during the brief window that supermajority existed, but that doesn’t mean it happened on his watch. Those judges were put in office when he was out of office and could do nothing, and when the ruling happened it was entirely out of his hands.

    • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      -16
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Again, the issue of judges is something the Dems, including him, could have fixed in period of super majorities. Biden was part of at least two. VP during one. They could done in 1993 with Clinton, it was already well established that the constitution of the supreme Court was an issue and that the Republicans were trying to take control of it.

      https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/ronald-reagans-big-impact-on-the-supreme-court

      That’s entirely on them. You know how ommission is still a lie? Well inaction works the same.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade
        link
        fedilink
        109 months ago

        And that makes him just as bad as the people who actively campaigned for and carried this out. On the same level, with no discernable difference between them, and that’s why we should let the guy who nominated the judges who actually did this back into office so he can carry out the vengeance he’s promising. I expect that’ll work out great. Virtually identical to another Biden term.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            Yup. 1:1 identical.

            Look. The Dems are not good enough. 100% agree. But there’s still a vast difference between “inadequately good” and “actively malicious”, and it’s pretty clear which party is which here. There’s no comparison between the people who failed to protect abortion, and the people who want to send women to jail for miscarriages and herd trans people into camps, and if the inadequately good party had held power through the trump years instead of the actively malicious party, we wouldn’t have the fucked up dobbs ruling, we wouldn’t have the fucked up IVF ruling, we wouldn’t have Tennessee making it legal to refuse to conduct marriage.

            The Dems are weak. The Republicans hate us and want us to suffer and die.

            • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              -11
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              It’s not that the Dems aren’t good enough, it’s that they are willfully letting it happen because the fear panders to their base. It’s the pied piper strategy. One that worked oh so well for the Dems primary and Hilary if you recall.

              • HopeOfTheGunblade
                link
                fedilink
                69 months ago

                So, again, you’d rather this gets significantly worse. Because that’s what comes from letting the republicans win.

                Also Biden’s done a lot of positive things. I voted for “not Trump” and he’s well exceeded expectations. There have also been significant disappointments; I wanted him to be better on Israel / Palestine, but that’s no good reason to give the office to the guy who’ll happily nuke Gaza before he fellates Putin.

                • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -11
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  No what I’m telling you is that you are actively participating in this vicious cycle. And yeah actually, being actively complicit in genocide (an actual legal term under international law) is indeed a good reason not to vote for someone.

                  • HopeOfTheGunblade
                    link
                    fedilink
                    59 months ago

                    Do you think that if you don’t participate it goes away? Because people tried that in 2016, and it didn’t go away, it got worse. You are participating in this world until you leave, there is no ethical consumption under capitalism but you still have to eat. The device you are writing your posts on most likely owns a share of a dead slave child. You can’t live in this world and have totally clean hands. The best you can hope for is to steer it, a little bit, in a better direction, and sitting on your hands so you don’t have to recognize the inevitable blood on them and get to feel pure ain’t it, friend.