• @EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -110 months ago

    You’re only admitting that you don’t understand the difference between fact and opinion.

    • @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      It’s got nothing to do with me.

      The policies that regulate hair length for male students are designed to target minorities and are racist. These are facts. Picking alternate facts is not an opinion.

      • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        These are facts.

        I’m sure it’s true in some cases, but the blanket claim that it’s the only reason is an opinion (and almost certainly an incorrect one at that). So the fact that you don’t understand the difference between a fact and a opinion has everything to do with you.

        • @ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          It’s true for the case that we are discussing in the article and every other time it’s been used to punish minorities. Your argument is splitting hairs over word choice instead focusing on the content of my argument.

          • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Your argument is splitting hairs over word choice

            You claimed an opinion was a fact and that I was factually wrong for having a different opinion than you. It’s not “splitting hairs” to point out you have no clue what you’re talking about.

            If you recognize that you used the wrong word, say “I apologize, you’re right, I used the wrong term” and then simply rephrase your argument. Stop trying to make it my fault you said something absolutely ridiculous and I called it out