• @WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    379 months ago

    as a german i feel divided, on one hand its a step in the right direction, on the other hand it doesn’t go remotely far enough in my opinion.

    • @notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      339 months ago

      I think this is perfect. Make it legal but non-commercial. It should not be allowed to make a profit off of other people’s addiction and there shouldn’t be financial incentives to get people addicted as quickly as possible.

      I wish they would do the same for alcohol, tobacco, gambling, etc.

      • @WbrJr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        209 months ago

        I would be very careful with that. Not official alcohol for example can be very dangerous if the person making it does not know about methanol, which is toxic. If it is not destilled properly, it can end up in the final mix and cause dangerous problems. I guess it goes with other drugs as well. People will still make a profit from it, just without taxes. It’s just easier to justify having some plants at home. So the state is missing out on drug taxes, which could be quite high (lol).

        So by creating drug stores, where you can buy controlled, legal drugs would be a lot mor profitable for the state, healthier for society and better for the consumer.

        This half assed weird regulation will be used by the conservative parties to justify blocking further legalisation by arguing it’s already free I guess

      • htrayl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There are definitely financial incentives, they are just underground now. Which is worse in every way.

        • @unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          149 months ago

          Ah yeah because dealers didnt exist before? Also it will be allowed to run non profit clubs to grow weed as a community. And you can grow it at home so no incentive for underground markets at all. Dealers are gonna slowly disappear if anything.

    • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think this is fine because while people should be allowed to do light drugs I don’t mind making them jump through some hoops so that it’s not that convenient. Alcohol and nicotine are definitely way too accessible and it affects perception of this law.

      I use cannabis in Poland where we accidentally legalized it by allowing doctors to prescribe it online which combined with corruption means anyone who wants it can get it but it’s not so obvious unless you’re interested. It’s a surprisingly OK compromise.

      • @WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        I think if you’re not harming anyone else you should be allowed to do whatever you want. I don’t see, why drugs are prohibited in the first place.

        • @fr0g@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well, who’s gonna pay for your medical care when you inevitably develop drug problems/health issues. So in a socialized healthcare system, you are harming others with it.

          (And not offering treatment or making the patient pay for it which they often won’t be able to, would be very inhumane imo)

          • 🦄🦄🦄
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Well, who’s gonna pay for your medical care when you inevitably develop drug problems/health issues.

            The same that pays for alcoholics, injuries from extreme sports and people suffering from heart attacks because of an unhealthy lifestyle already?

        • xigoi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          It’s easy to harm other people by doing drugs. For example, a parent who smokes will make life worse for their child.

    • IndigoAmber
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      @WallEx @misk As far as I see it, it is still (probably) the most liberal cannabis legislation in the EU. So… yay.

      • @novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        10 Dutch cities legalised weed not too long ago. They legalised the production and sale. The coffee shops and other shops in those cities all sell 100% legal weed. So, yeah…

        • IndigoAmber
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          @novibe Also, (I think,) weed is technically still illegal in the Netherlands, but for example possession up to 5g is tolerated by simply not enforcing the law.
          Germany on the other hand fully legalized possession of up to 25g (50g).

          • @novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Yes but in the cities that legalised it the limits are different. For growing and possession.

            • @novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              I think they for sure are gonna change it. That really makes no sense. One plant will can give more than that if you even marginally know what you’re doing.

        • IndigoAmber
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          @novibe Yes, but that’s still just experimental / in a testing phase and how most coffee shops operate currently is a legal grey area. And I don’t expect that to change soon, because ultimately they can’t fully legalize cannabis for the same reasons Germany could not: it would conflict with EU regulations.

          • @novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            But wouldn’t it be possible for cities to legalize it locally only then? Like… every city?