• @discostjohn@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    410 months ago

    Jesus Christ, you keep repeating the same ridiculous argument without processing what anyone else is saying to you. Are you drunk, dude?

    Do you think Stan Lee made all his characters as explicit references to “institutionalized and concentrated power in the real world”?

    You seem like you’ve never read a comic in your life, but maybe watched a few YouTube videos about superhero politics, sort of understood them, and then made it your mission to proselytize those ridiculous opinions.

    • @masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -210 months ago

      Jesus Christ

      Appealing to Christ will not magically make your super-creep “heroes” less problematic.

      Do you think Stan Lee made all his characters as explicit references to “institutionalized and concentrated power in the real world”?

      Yep. I have to give Stan Lee credit that, at least, with some (not all) of his characters he tried to circumvent the fundamental nature of the super-creep genre - such as with Peter Parker, for instance - but that doesn’t change the rigidly Ayn Randian nature of the universe this genre exists within.

      You seem like you’ve never read a comic in your life

      I was reading this stuff (and discovering far better stuff) long before the Berlin Wall fell, Clyde - sure you want to go down this route?

      mission to proselytize those ridiculous opinions.

      It doesn’t matter how reactionary you get about this - the subtext of the super-creep genre is what it is and can never be anything else.

      They are still fictional characters that justifies institutionalized and concentrated power - no matter what the good but naive intentions of their creators might be - that is what they always have been and always will be.