Google apologizes for ‘missing the mark’ after Gemini generated racially diverse Nazis::Google says it’s aware of historically inaccurate results for its Gemini AI image generator, following criticism that it depicted historically white groups as people of color.

  • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 months ago

    Because sometimes you want an image of George Washington, riding a dinosaur, while eating a cheeseburger, in Paris.

    Which you actually can’t do on Bing anyway, since it ‘content warning’ stops you from generating anything with George Washington…

    Ask it for a Founding Father though, it’ll even hand him a gat!

    https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/dab26e07-34c8-422e-944f-83d7f719ea2e.jpeg

      • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Funnily enough, he’s not eating one in the other three images either. He’s holding an M16 in one, with the dinosaur partially as a hamburger (?). In the other two he’s merely holding the burger.

        I assume if I change the word order around a bit, I could get him to enjoy that burger :D

        • @VoterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          This is the thing. There’s an incredible number of inaccuracies in the picture, several of which flat out ignore the request in the prompt, and we laugh it off. But the AI makes his skin a little bit darker? Write the Washington Post! Historical accuracy! Outrage!

          • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Well, the tech is of course still young. And there’s a distinct difference between:

            A) User error: a prompt that isn’t as good as it can be, with the user understanding for example the ‘order of operations’ that the AI model likes to work in.

            B) The tech flubbing things because it’s new and constantly in development

            C) The owners behind the tech injecting their own modifiers into the AI model in order to get a more diverse result.

            For example, in this case I understand the issue: the original prompt was ‘image of an American Founding Father riding a dinosaur, while eating a cheeseburger, in Paris.’ Doing it in one long sentence with several comma’s makes it harder for the AI to pin down the ‘main theme’ from my experience. Basically, it first thinks ‘George on a dinosaur’ with the burger and Paris as afterthoughts. But if you change the prompt around a bit to ‘An American Founding Father is eating a cheeseburger. He is riding on a dinosaur. In the background of the image, we see Paris, France.’, you end up with the correct result:

            Basically the same input, but by simply swapping around the wording it got the correct result. Other ‘inaccuracies’ are of course to be expected, since I didn’t really specify anything for the AI to go of. I didn’t give it a timeframe for one, so it wouldn’t ‘know’ not to have the Eiffel Tower and a modern handgun in it. Or that that flag would be completely wrong.

            The problem is with C) where you simply have no say in the modifiers that they inject into any prompt you send. Especially when the companies state that they are doing it on purpose so the AI will offer a more diverse result in general. You can write the best, most descriptive prompt and there will still be an unexpected outcome if it injects their modifiers in the right place of your prompt. That’s the issue.

            • @VoterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              C is just a work around for B and the fact that the technology has no way to identify and overcome harmful biases in its data set and model. This kind of behind the scenes prompt engineering isn’t even unique to diversifying image output, either. It’s a necessity to creating a product that is usable by the general consumer, at least until the technology evolves enough that it can incorporate those lessons directly into the model.

              And so my point is, there’s a boatload of problems that stem from the fact that this is early technology and the solutions to those problems haven’t been fully developed yet. But while we are rightfully not upset that the system doesn’t understand that lettuce doesn’t go on the bottom of a burger, we’re for some reason wildly upset that it tries to give our fantasy quasi-historical figures darker skin.

    • @pirat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      The random lettuce between every layer is weirdly off-putting to me. It seems like it’s been growing on the burger for quite some time :D

      • @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Doesn’t look too bad to me. I love a fair bit of crispy lettuce on a burger. Doing it like that at least spreads it out a bit, rather than having a big chunk of lettuce.

        Still, it that was my burger… I’d add another patty and extra cheese.