• @Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    Doing it would mainly call Trump’s bluffs, and help put to rest the “handlers are hiding him from the public” line of attack.

    And did fine by my personal opinion. If my memory serves, he mainly played to the calm in the face of Trump’s crazy, and it worked well. Particularly with moderates.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      His bluffs are never-ending and he can put that to rest by simply not hiding from the public. Just get out there and talk. He doesn’t need to stand on a stage while Trump yells over him.

      • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        I disagree, I think showing the contrast directly is necessary in the face of modern media bubbling. Trump yelling over him does not hurt him.

          • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 months ago

            Unfortunately, a fair number of people, most likely. People can have short memories with politics, and the presidential debates tend to draw a wide audience. On top of that, some people are simply new to the political world in the past 4 years, finally reaching voting age and such.

            He’s a veteran politician, spent decades in the Senate. There’s probably few people on the planet that can handle yelling as smoothly as he can. He’ll benefit from facing it down. People want strength and resilience in a president.

              • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                39 months ago

                No, but she had to battle sexism and subconscious biases. He’s in a different situation.

                Hilary probably should’ve gone for the nuts. It’s not fair, but neither is politics.