• @reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    809 months ago

    TLDR: A glitch on the website showed test numbers. The ones drawn earlier in the week on live tv weren’t the numbers shown on the website for a couple of hours.

    IMHO: Dude’s gonna lose his lawsuit because of the live drawing.

    • @huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      279 months ago

      Depends on how much the guy did in reasonable expectation of having won.

      Like if he quit his job thinking he could retire it’d be rash but not unreasonable for a lottery winner.

      • @GustavoFring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        Quitting your job before getting any actual money would be a total Chad move. Now he would have to Larry David his way back in by just showing up back at with like nothing happened.

        • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          That’s what a lot of people have done. It was also up for three days so it’s not unreasonable.

      • @4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        There would be good reason not to do this when testing the backend of a computer system for accuracy.

        That being said, if the display is in test mode there no reason not to set the font to Wingdings. And probably have a big “TEST MODE -NOT OFFICIAL” banner.

        • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          There’s no reason not to put up the real numbers, least of all for the three days these were up for.

    • @ringwraithfish@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      199 months ago

      Last November, the Iowa Lottery posted the wrong Powerball numbers, citing a “human reporting error”. However, the Iowa Lottery said that the temporary winners – people who had the numbers at issue – could keep their prizes, which ranged from $4 to $200.

      I wonder how this precedent is going to be factored into this situation. $4-$200 is much easier to say “just let them have it” than the jackpot