@pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 11 months agoWhy we cook at home rulemedia.kbin.runimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1925arrow-down11
arrow-up1924arrow-down1imageWhy we cook at home rulemedia.kbin.run@pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-square@Coreidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoThanks for proving my point. ROFL. Way to go slugger.
minus-square@doctorcrimson@lemmy.todaylinkfedilink1•edit-211 months agoYour point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
minus-square@Coreidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoNope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office. The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side. It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.
Removed by mod
Thanks for proving my point. ROFL.
Way to go slugger.
Your point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I’m arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
Nope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office.
The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side.
It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.