• @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    19 months ago

    … Any dogma? It’s like the claim “that’s illegal” presupposes a body of law. No matter which one.

    • @NeverNudeNo13
      link
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s not how legal systems work… Plenty of things are legal in one place and illegal in another. No Christians are worried about blasphemy against Zeus or Jupiter. Like wise a Zoroastrian is only concerned about blasphemy against Ahura Mazda and not Allah.

      • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’m claiming that the accusation or blasphemy presupposes a frame or reference. In this frame of reference, you can make objective statements. Not that this frame of reference is absolute.

        In your line o reasoning, velocity would be subjective.

        • @NeverNudeNo13
          link
          19 months ago

          Velocity is not suggestive because it is defined as speed in a direction.

          In your example you are only taking speed, assuming direction and stating velocity.

            • @NeverNudeNo13
              link
              19 months ago

              This is the silliest shit I’ve ever discussed on the Internet. I will say kudos to you for keeping things mostly amicable. It’s been awhile since I’ve had an argument on topicality and it’s been entertaining for me. Thanks my friend, best wishes.