VATICAN CITY (CNS) – People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual – this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

  • @TheAlbacor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -110 months ago

    Progress won’t come from any Christianity (and likely almost any religion, but I don’t know others well enough to comment). They will either need to denounce the book as being bullshit and decide to progress or they will continue to hold society behind.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      It’s worth mentioning that during the dark ages, it was actually monks who preserved history and scientific knowledge, and advanced it. Even afterwards, Mendelian genetics was discovered by Gregor Mendel, a friar and abbot.

      On top of that though, a lot of scientific knowledge and mathematics was preserved and cultivated by Islamic empires concurrent to the dark ages. They were in the middle of a golden age and progressed those fields further.

      The problem isn’t so much religion in itself, but evangelicals and literalists who put it above everything else. Zealots ruin it all.

      • @TheAlbacor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Yeah, the Catholic Church guarded access to education, preventing the rest of the commoners from learning how poorly they translated the Bible to maintain control of the people. It’s too bad the Protestant movement didn’t destroy the Catholic Church.

      • @TheAlbacor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        You mean despite of Christianity.

        The book is bigger than at its base. Our society cannot progress without removing it from a focal point.

        • Jojo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 months ago

          The Catholic Church has sponsored plenty of progressive endeavors, both in the fields of science and otherwise. Which is to say nothing of the numerous Catholic people who have done progressive things and would place their faith as their reason for doing so. So there is a lot of progress that has been made because of the church.

          That being said, there have also been far too many times where the church deliberately resisted important progress and/or attempted to undo it, hence progress despite the church.

          I don’t know where the balance lies on that, but I do think it’s worth acknowledging both and even moreso acknowledging attempts from within to ensure more of the former and less of the latter.

          • @Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yes, for several hundred years, monks were the largest literate social group in Europe. Libraries and the invention of book printing would never have become so large without monasteries and the church.

            In those times, science wasn’t per se in opposition to the church, that is a relatively modern approach.

            • Jojo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              Numerous times, they just didn’t call it a crusade. Wars and genocide aren’t unique to Christians, or even to religion.

              And actually, come to think of it, yes, wasn’t the third crusade organized by secular parties (kings and such) and not the Pope? If that makes it because of Christianity, then the Iraq war was because of WMDs…