• @fitgse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -439 months ago

    I’m all for protesting the government and their actions. But I am a bit torn on this.

    It’s like being a US tourist while Trump is in office and being denied everything because you are associated with you government.

    I hate it too. But I am not my government.

    • Hegar
      link
      fedilink
      709 months ago

      They refused to shake hands because one of the israeli players called them all antisemites in the pre game interviews.

      Ireland has a long history of supporting the palestinian cause - consistently the highest in europe - which is what the player was intentionally mischaracterising as antisemitism.

        • Hegar
          link
          fedilink
          249 months ago

          Sorry, let me get the full quote and some more context:

          In an interview published on Tuesday by the Israeli Basketball Association, Saar addressed the upcoming match with Ireland. “It’s known that they are quite antisemitic and it’s no secret, and maybe that’s why a strong game is expected,” she said. “We talk about it among ourselves. We know they don’t love us and we will leave everything on the field always and in this game especially.”

          An official quote at a formal press interview that implicates the entire team.

          • @CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -219 months ago

            Have the been antisemetic? If I was on a team, I would not be expected to be blamed for what my teammates had to say.

            • Hegar
              link
              fedilink
              259 months ago

              Have the been antisemetic?

              See my comment you originally replied to.

              what my teammates

              If an official representative of the team slags off the other side without reason before the game, and says the entire team thinks this, with no apology or attempt to clarify that that person was wrong and only speaking for themselves, that’s shitty behavior from the entire team.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      449 months ago

      National sports teams represent their countries.

      Sports boycotts are a useful way of alerting a country’s citizens that we are upset by the actions of the government they have chosen to represent them.

    • @Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      329 months ago

      The Israel players spent time taking photos with IOF soldiers.

      Maybe it is wrong to assume complicity of individuals in their governments actions, maybe it isn’t, but you don’t need to make any assumptions here.

    • Xariphon
      link
      fedilink
      199 months ago

      These people are choosing to represent their country, not just going about their private business.

    • @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      179 months ago

      It might suck, but yeah we kinda deserved to be excluded from the world stage for allowing trump to be president. Anyone that is willing to represent Israel/Russia/Saudi Arabia right now is kinda a piece of shit.

    • @cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      179 months ago

      You don’t go around calling people out for it though. You agree with them that Trump is a jerk and that you didn’t want him to become a president. This is different. The Israeli team called the Irish team antisemitic because they don’t like what Israel is doing. The truth though is that it has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the genocide that Israel is inflicting on Palestine

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s one way to push governments to change, especially in a representative democracy. It’s why businesses are pulling their operations from Russia (and to a much lesser extent Israel).

      Edit: Typo.

    • @danekrae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -39 months ago

      Both Israel and the US have representative democracies. Views of the government are the views of the people.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        That would be true if we didn’t have an electoral college. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.

          • magnetosphere
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The alternative was worse. Most Presidential elections aren’t about picking the candidate you want - they boil down to who you dislike less.

            Besides, I wasn’t “defending” anyone; I was simply pointing out a fact.

            • @danekrae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The hours everybody spends in supermarkets, picking out the things they don’t want to buy, so they’re only left with what they want… But the alternative is worse…

          • Exocrinous
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Let’s rephrase:

            Despite being appointed president for four years, Donald Trump has never been elected by the popular will of the people.

            • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Ok, but that has never been the way the president has been selected? The popular vote for president isn’t how the American Election system works and never has. Do you get upset if in football the team with the most yards doesn’t win? Or the most base hits? Or the most gold in League of Legends?

              • Exocrinous
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                We’re not talking about whether the US does things like it’s always done. We’re talking about whether it’s a democracy and whether the views of the government are the views of the people. It does pretty poorly on the first one and fails completely on the second.

        • @chillhelm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -29 months ago

          They both approximate perfect representation close enough. If the difference between one government or the other comes down to variations that are basically explained by the weather being good or bad on voting day, you can’t really claim that the government isn’t representative.

          Just because it didn’t represent YOUR opinion, it doesn’t make it less representative. A truly representative government will make decisions that align with 10% of the population 10% of the time. So if 10% of the population want to bomb Canada a perfectly representative government will make it happen every 40 years or so.

      • The Bard in Green
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        But with just some VERY MINOR tweaks to the system, the “views of the people” would be very different. In the US, the system is OPENLY engineered to preserve existing power structures, in ways that have accumulated over the decades (Jerrymandering, Electoral College and First Past The Post all add up…)