So, when Johnson rose to speak on the House floor Wednesday — his first such speech since being elected speaker — and began to talk about immigration, it was through the lens of a politician seeking to effect a political outcome.
Johnson’s speech went on at some length, focusing on Republican resistance to new legislation aimed at addressing the border and his party’s efforts to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
That “by design” line is eyebrow-raising, given the popularity on the right of the conspiracy theory that Democrats are throwing open the entry doors to the country for some putative future political gain.
This idea that immigrants are inherently frightening is a key part of the Republican discussion of the border, given that it heightens a sense of urgency and failure regarding the administration.
It’s all framing: Johnson wants listeners to hear the phrase “military aged” and assume that the immigrants are dangerous and intend to harm Americans.
So, a 24-year-old guy looking for work who comes into the United States is suddenly lumped into an imaginary army of invaders — bolstering not only Johnson’s rhetoric but the argument of Republicans such as Texas Gov.
The original article contains 1,119 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
How bizarre, considering immigrants are famously more likely to fight FOR our country and not against it. Why do conservatives hate our military servicemen and women?
Because being in the military shows you how much dumb bullshit you have to inject into day-to-day life for free1 housing, food and medical care (not to mention the clothing reimbursement every couple years or however that works now) to be unappealing.
1
Government-provided, taxpayer-funded but free to consumer at the time the benefit is received. You know what I mean.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
So, when Johnson rose to speak on the House floor Wednesday — his first such speech since being elected speaker — and began to talk about immigration, it was through the lens of a politician seeking to effect a political outcome.
Johnson’s speech went on at some length, focusing on Republican resistance to new legislation aimed at addressing the border and his party’s efforts to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
That “by design” line is eyebrow-raising, given the popularity on the right of the conspiracy theory that Democrats are throwing open the entry doors to the country for some putative future political gain.
This idea that immigrants are inherently frightening is a key part of the Republican discussion of the border, given that it heightens a sense of urgency and failure regarding the administration.
It’s all framing: Johnson wants listeners to hear the phrase “military aged” and assume that the immigrants are dangerous and intend to harm Americans.
So, a 24-year-old guy looking for work who comes into the United States is suddenly lumped into an imaginary army of invaders — bolstering not only Johnson’s rhetoric but the argument of Republicans such as Texas Gov.
The original article contains 1,119 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
How bizarre, considering immigrants are famously more likely to fight FOR our country and not against it. Why do conservatives hate our military servicemen and women?
Because being in the military shows you how much dumb bullshit you have to inject into day-to-day life for free1 housing, food and medical care (not to mention the clothing reimbursement every couple years or however that works now) to be unappealing.
1
Government-provided, taxpayer-funded but free to consumer at the time the benefit is received. You know what I mean.
The bureaucracy of the military is not at all representative of what would be necessary to ensure people’s basic needs are met.