Qatar’s prime minister and US secretary of state say Hamas has responded to outlines of proposed deal

When the leader of Hamas in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, launched his devastating assault on Israel on 7 October, the militant group’s exiled leadership, like the rest of the world, was apparently caught unawares.

From plush penthouses in Beirut, Doha and Istanbul, they watched the carnage that killed 1,200 Israelis unfold, as well as Israel’s retaliatory campaign on the Gaza Strip. In the past four months Israel has killed an estimated 27,600 people, displaced 85% of the 2.3 million population and razed more than half of the besieged Palestinian territory’s infrastructure.

In the early days of the war, while Sinwar’s cadre was calling on Arab peoples across the Middle East to join the fight against Israel, the Doha-based chair of Hamas’s political bureau, Ismail Haniyeh, appeared to focus on damage control. Talks mediated by Egypt, Qatar and the US resulted in a ceasefire and hostage and prisoner swaps at the end of November that lasted seven days before collapsing.

Now, it seems that those roles have reversed. According to reports, it is Sinwar and his men, exhausted from the fighting, who want to reach a temporary truce deal, and Haniyeh’s office that is demanding more concessions and holding out for a complete Israeli withdrawal.

Archive

  • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2•11 months ago

    You are indeed right about that. But that would mean that Haniyeh is their only contact person which also seems doubtable.

    In any case since the article contains this line

    “It is also possible that their positions are not so far apart and the talks are derailing for some other reason. These are very sensitive negotiations, and it doesn’t take much for someone to throw in a wrench if they want to strut about for some personal motivation we don’t know about.”

    It seems like we’re basically just gossiping without any real evidence. Which makes the headline pure clickbait.

    • @breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOPEnglish
      2•11 months ago

      It could mean that. But it could also mean that they just respect his position as much or more.

      And yeah, they absolutely might also be on the same page. The article is clear that these are rumors that aren’t verifiable. There isn’t a way to easily report on them though. This tracks with reporting about a widening split that’s been going on for a long time but we should take it with a grain of salt for sure.