• @Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5011 months ago

    The most sinister is an almost inescapable one, where companies intentionally build things (larger appliances are a huge offender) to fail within 3 to 5 years.

    It’s the “a poor man can’t afford cheap shoes” thing.

    They love to “sell” this concept that making items cheaper means consumers can more frequently replace as their styles change. Fuck you, give me a white fridge that never breaks, I don’t care if I have to pay double up front.

    • @Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      I realized this was a significant part of my expenses about a decade ago now, and started researching and budgeting for higher-quality products that don’t get as much advertisement as their cheaper counterparts. It’s been great! What started as a larger expense on the front end has already broken about even on potential replacements that I didn’t end up needing, plus I get high-quality items to use the whole way through as well!

      It’s definitely a good thing to pay attention to just how much you spend on replacing things that broke down unexpectedly quickly. The higher-quality items often exist, but a lot of times you need to seek out the niche communities that focus on those products to help find them and parse through the available options. I’m sure a lot of people just aren’t able to front the charge to make the change, though.

    • @___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Producing superfluous items uses energy which also has to be paid for. A cost we all pay.