• queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      Well, what is the function of having sex/gender on an ID? It’s to make someone more identifiable, right?

      That means that “verification” only needs to be visual. The purpose is to be able to tell, at a glance, that the ID and the person are a match. That’s why eye color and height are on there too. Precise record keeping is for the court house and hospital records, not a driver’s license.

      By using sex and making that unchangeable it actually makes my ID less useful for identifying me.

        • @Saxoboneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          This process is already gatekept, to my knowledge. In my state, changing your legal gender id or name requires going through the courts and a substantial amount of legal paperwork - even if you do so without a lawyer, there are some substantial fees associated with that process. Not to mention if someone wanted to become less identifiable, they probably wouldn’t want to do that in a way that is available as public record. Personally, I’d probably just get a haircut - they’re a lot faster and a lot cheaper.

          Additionally, banning everyone - especially banning exclusively trans people - from fixing their documentation is not a reasonable solution to your hypothetical problem, a fact so obvious anyone arguing in good faith almost certainly would have caught it.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          -6
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Then they’d get harassed by cops for having a suspected fake ID and have to go through the trouble of proving its their actual ID.

          Like I am going to be when we get a law like this.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      1010 months ago

      That’s an advantage that trans people who can ‘pass’ have, but not every person looks physically enough like their expressed gender and suddenly they’re “a man in a dress” or something.