• @Fox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    -610 months ago

    I’m not sure why you’d advocate for it if you’ve actually read the history, it’s a terrible idea that has failed spectacularly in the past

      • @Fox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Talking about price controls which are not the same thing at all. Read about the Nixon shock, for example.

        • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Yeah, the relief doesn’t go to agribusiness and might stand a chance of benefiting individual humans, so both parties agree it’s always bad and they’ll never do it.

          • @Fox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Sure, instead it’s true based on a simple observation that the president isn’t using executive power to set an upper limit (price control) on the cost of groceries. A subsidy might reduce the starting price of something but a grocery store can still charge whatever they want for it. Which I’m pretty sure is the whole point of this thread?

    • @mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      I know about a ton of food subsidies that we’re pretty useful, dunno about groceries though.

      Any source?