• @fastandcurious@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    -13
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Corporations have been stealing ever since the dawn of time, anyone working under a big company willingly is not the one to blame, and also what’s with this ‘I know everything’ stuff in the comments section? Is your only basis of hating 90% of the world’s population is that they believe in a god? If anyone can tell for a fact that God doesn’t exist, go on, but everyone knows its a matter of choice and you can’t prove that god doesn’t exist

    • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You are all over the place.

      But I want to give you the benefit of the doubt and reply to your specific points.

      Corporations have been stealing ever since the dawn of time, anyone working under a big company willingly is not the one to blame

      That is a strawman argument.
      In most societies people are more or less forced to work for some employer, so I think it is hard to blame a worker for the company he works for.
      And additionally I think one can blame a worker if they choose to work for the ethically worst companies.

      Is your only basis of hating 90% of the world’s population is that they believe in a god?

      That is very insulting.
      I don’t hate religious people, my mother is deeply religious and I truly love her.
      But she is misguided and gives time, effort, believe and most of all money to an organization that still to this day promotes homophobia, suppresses women and staunchly defends child rapists.

      I don’t like that and I won’t stop criticizing it.

      but everyone knows its a matter of choice and you can’t prove that god doesn’t exist

      Off course it is your prerogative to believe in god.
      I wouldn’t ever want to ban you from believing in whatever you want.

      But you shouldn’t be surprised if people put you in the same category with people believing in a flat earth or something like that.

      If you just choose to believe random stuff without evidence than it is only natural that your opinion is not taken seriously.

      It is not like there are two equally valid theories about what to believe.
      One group believes in things if there is proof and one group believes in things because some dude from the bronze ages wrote it down.

      • @fastandcurious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        -210 months ago

        I am gonna make an apology for the fact that I am getting a little bit excited, which might be becoming apparent, religion is a complex subject and discussing so much matter is a bit complex and no one here in the comments seems to be interested in having a discussion but rather spouting nonsense against 90% of the world

        But I will agree that I am also against giving money to organizations that promotes hate, whether it’s affiliated with religion or not, that money is better spent on a better cause, and I also respect the fact that you don’t hate religious people, but also there are lots of institutions affiliated with religion that work for a good cause, a lot of churches and mosque provide shelter, gurudwaras are famous for providing food, atleast where I live

        The thing is I don’t think a person should be judged for their beliefs but rather they should be judged based on their actions, a person kills someone, it should be condemned, no matter if he is a priest or the pope, a person donates money to the charity and helps someone, that should be praised, no matter what he believes personally about god

        Me believing in a flat earth is me disbelieving in a proven fact, you would be right to call me dumb, but there is no study that disproves the existence of god, so if anyone believes in one, you can’t call him/her dumb because it’s not against any proven fact, it’s just that he thinks that life around him is enough evidence that someone out there exists, and there is nothing unscientific or unreasonable about that, and spouting hate comments against them and claiming they are dumb, banning them for wearing a piece of clothing is just wrong, no matter how you look at it.

        • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß
          link
          fedilink
          1210 months ago

          Hey first and foremost, thanks for the good faith discussion.

          I want you to be reassured that I don’t hate you for your religion.
          And I don’t think you or any religious person is necessarily dumb.
          We just happen to fundamentally disagree on certain points that seem to hold at least some value for both our lives.

          And I will gladly admit that believing in god has the fundamental difference to believing in a flat earth that you described. The flat earth is soundly disproven and the existence of god is not.

          I would in reply try to refine my point to saying that I think believing in god is comparable to believing in the easter bunny or the often quoted flying spaghetti monster (that I purposefully didn’t want to invoke earlier).

          Yes you are absolutely free to believe in any of those things.
          I would fight to defend your right to believe in them.

          But I cannot ever accept it as truth or even an educated opinion to hold without any proof pointing specifically towards the existence of any god.

          And not to end on a negative note.
          I love life around me, I love nature, I love animals.
          I think the world is a wonder.

          I do not believe any god made it the way it is.
          I have no reason to believe that.
          I just love it for itself.

        • Cowbee [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Nobody is saying that people should be judged by their religion. People here are saying Religion itself encourages anti-science and bigoted views.

          Secondly, it’s absolutely unscientific to believe that the lack of disproof is sufficient evidence for belief. This is fundamentally unreasonable and is just as much proof as saying that pigs can fly when nobody observes them.

          No, religious people are not morally wrong for being religious, and they are not to blame. Religion itself is.

          • @fastandcurious@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            -1210 months ago

            Listen everyone! According to cowbee, we should make sure that from now on, nobody will ever put out any hypothesis ever again! It’s absolutely unscientific! Any claim should be absolutely 100% correct and if not, we should leave it at there!

            • Cowbee [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              1210 months ago

              No, that is not what I’ve said.

              Believing firmly in a hypothesis without confirmation of said hypothesis is not sound. Again, pigs flying when nobody can see them, and firmly believing in it.

              This gets additionally dicey when religion is used as a tool to restrict women’s rights, and uphold homophobia, transphobia, and racism.

              The scientific method works by creating a hypothesis, and testing it to verify. It does not work by creating a hypothesis and firmly believing in it until its disproven. You take an agnostic approach until confirmed one way or the other.