• @Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    711 months ago

    Steam has had years of first mover advantage. If it wasnt ahead it would be shameful.

    • @glitches_brew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2211 months ago

      There’s truth to that, but there also isn’t really any reason why we couldn’t have a second exceptional launcher and store for games. It would be nice if we did.

      • @TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Yeah there’s been plenty of competition with a lot of money behind them that have still failed to beat Steam, look at Epic

          • @TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            Yeah, that’s why they failed. They opted for really short sighted options and throwing money at it rather than actually trying to compete legitimately.

            • HarkMahlberg
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              Sorry, didn’t realize we were in agreement haha. I wonder if network effects would kill any real steam competitor before it has a chance, and maybe that’s why Epic tried to capture that userbase first.

              • @TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Another issue is that Steam already does so much for both the consumer and developers. People got all pissed about their 30% cut (mostly because Epic told them to tbh) but Steam actually does provide a lot of services for games on the platform like Workshop. I guess they technically provide forums too but those are a hell scape and would probably be better off destroyed.