• @umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    yo but tbh this gets old.

    i just want my stuff to update without me having to find out a year later its unmantained and had a fork all along.

    or having to watch the repositories of stuff i use for signs it might be unmantained. i didnt know half the (popular!) stuff mentioned here was abandoned then forked.

    libforknotifier when (or even how)?

    • @irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 months ago

      Yeah, it would be nice if it was easier for devs to just turn over the project to an “official” fork. Unfortunately, I’m sure that would get abused by scammers taking over projects forcefully and adding in malware before anyone notices.

      • @9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        You’re spot on with the latter, I’ve come across a few projects over the years where the ownership is transferred and it’s then loaded up with malware or even just instantly abandoned again because the new owner just wants it on their GitHub to get a job or something.

        • @Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’ve come across a few projects over the years where the ownership is transferred and it’s then loaded up with malware

          See: The Great Suspender

          The original developer sold the repo to a new, anonymous maintainer. The new maintainer abandoned the repo but continued updating the Chrome Web Store version of the addon. That version eventually got delisted by Google for including malware.

    • @lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      I’ve kept away from some projects because it’s just a single dev doing 99.9% of the contributions.