• @dmonzel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -29
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    at least for women fertility begins to decline at 32.

    That’s a little bit of a yikes there, buddy.

    Edit: and additional “yikes” for all of the people that don’t see the problem with assigning a value to women based on how fertile they may or may not be.

    Edit 2: tHe QuAnTiTy Of EgGs! Because women only exist to get pregnant.

    • @gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      Why is that a yikes? More birth defects, complications, start running low on eggs. All of that is just facts…

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      2210 months ago

      They said nothing about the value of a woman being tied to fertility, that came out of mind…

      As for the decline in fertility statement, that has been scientifically proven for decades and assumed for centuries. Women are born with a set amount of eggs, they typically go through at least one per ovulation cycle, they start reaching the end in their 30s and risks of birth defects start increasing in their 30s

    • Dr. Bob
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      The question was about marriage. There are two reasons that I see people get married. For young people it’s about starting a family. However you and I feel about it personally, legal structures that are in place just make it easier when you’re married. The other reason is for older people. Pensions and estate planning is easier for married couples. Again, I have opinions about it but it remains a plain fact.

      • @naught@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I got married to share healthcare and other tax advantages and do not plan to have children. I’m under 30 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • Dr. Bob
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          I envy you. My partner and I are DINKs. There has never been a tax break aimed at our demographic. lol.