- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
Biden, as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, largely resolved these problems, reducing maximum premium payments (net of subsidies) and eliminating the cliff at 400 percent. The result is to make health insurance coverage substantially more affordable, especially for middle-income Americans who previously earned too much to be eligible for subsidies. Hence the surge in marketplace enrollments.
Fucking election year, everybody fire up the spin. I hate politics :/
This is wildly better than whatever shit the repub propaganda machine is gonna fart out though, so I reckon I’ll be avoiding Facebook and YouTube for a bit ;)
This is an article discussing things Biden’s administration have accomplished during his term.
The GOP equivalent is shit like “the Democrats will take your guns” or “millions of brown people are threatening to invade the southern border”.
Ideally, the constituency would pay attention to the things the government does all the time and remember that when it comes to elections. But no one fucking does, so the public needs articles to remind them. Even if only like 30% of eligible voters end up voting.
This is exactly the kind of article that I would expect in the election year of a functioning democracy. The Republicans should be touting their own accomplishments too. Like Republican Chip Roy has been doing.
They’re too invested in hate over anything else to have a positive vision for the nation
Holding peoples livelihoods, their health, and rights hostage for votes and power is disgusting
True. Can’t imagine what horrors the republicans will get up to if they win.
You left out child labor, unless you’re including that under slavery, which it’s functionally equivalent to.
You realize you still have slavery to this day, right?
We are all slaves on a corporate plantation.
Yeah that’s fine, but the US has literal slaves doing literal slave labor thanks to the 13th amendment.
Elaborate
Instead of demanding everyone support your senile pedo Zionist you should be demanding the DNC offer up someone else.
I am asking that they offer someone else. But they don’t listen to me.
And they sure as fuck won’t listen if they get reelected. Re Electing them is a referendum of their prior actions.
Four more years of the status quo. Hold in there.
I mean, I’m very concerned that a second Trump term may result in a successful coup and… All that you said. But they’re not going to get a filibuster-proof majority, so even in the worst case, they won’t do all that. And no, they won’t end the filibuster to do it - for that, they would need a simple majority of MAGA Republicans in the Senate, and that’s not on the table either. The filibuster is antidemocratic and toxic, but it is a minor comfort at the moment. Of course, it would have never gotten this bad to begin with, without it.
EDIT to add: I think my above message was confusing, as it sounds like I said I’m concerned they would do all those things, and in the next breath contradict that. What I meant to say is that, barring a coup, even if the Republicans capture the House of Reps, Senate, and Whitehouse, it’s unrealistic for them to be able to do all of that legislatively. A coup, though, is a very realistic possibility, and as PugJesus pointed out in a reply, the Supreme Court can and may do all of that as well - but that remains true even if the Democrats control the other branches. It’s a terrifying time. Vote, please.
They don’t need a filibuster proof majority. All they need is the Supreme Court.
Well, yeah, although that path is really risky. But they also don’t need a second Trump term to do that. In fact, the court has clearly gone rogue even from the Republican party, and appears ready to keep throwing out the rule of law as long as they can get away with it, whether the party wants them to or not. Republican leadership absolutely didn’t expect their radicalized court would actually, for real, reverse Roe, and the party is paying for it. Now is certainly the time to hit them hard and take full advantage of that, until the Democrats have a filibuster-proof majority and can’t make any excuses.
I’m all for democracy, but I think that this is sadly the end result - When governing becomes the goal, governance takes the back seat. Being president or prime minister is simply too lucrative.
They aren’t actually doing much… This is something they did a while ago, they’re just trotting it out and showing it off because there isn’t anything current going on.
deleted by creator
I think I’m confused. How is this spin?
Maybe we have different definitions of spin. To me, accurately discussing the political accomplishments of one politician over another is good in a functioning democracy.