nukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 5 months agoHey guys I got an ideash.itjust.worksimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1414arrow-down110
arrow-up1404arrow-down1imageHey guys I got an ideash.itjust.worksnukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-square@AVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish32•5 months agoThey’re percentages, so they’d better
minus-square@skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deMlinkfedilinkEnglish7•5 months agoat some pooling stations turnout exceeded 100%, with something like 90%+ of votes for putin
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-25 months agoYour percentages only add up to 100? Sorry I always give 110%
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoNo, rounding errors mean they typically do not. E.g. 2.7% 10.6% and 86.7% would become 3% 11% an 87% which sum to 101.
minus-square@deur@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish12•5 months agoGood thing software has never been known to have fixes for problems like that as polish items.
minus-squarechingaderalinkfedilinkEnglish4•5 months agoWhy would you assume they round up without decimals?
They’re percentages, so they’d better
You familiar with russian voting percentages?
Enlighten me
at some pooling stations turnout exceeded 100%, with something like 90%+ of votes for putin
Your percentages only add up to 100? Sorry I always give 110%
No, rounding errors mean they typically do not. E.g. 2.7% 10.6% and 86.7% would become 3% 11% an 87% which sum to 101.
Good thing software has never been known to have fixes for problems like that as polish items.
Why would you assume they round up without decimals?