TL;DR

Don’t use snapchat

  • @JohnnyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    710 months ago

    From the article:

    A court in Madrid heard it was assumed the message triggered alarm bells after being picked up via Gatwick’s Wi-Fi network.

    Public wifi without a VPN is like sex without a condom. The connection may not be encrypted (very risky) and even if it is, you are still susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks: https://www.garlandtechnology.com/blog/how-to-monitor-encrypted-traffic-and-keep-your-network-secure

    I guarantee there will be a flood of articles about this over the next few days because of what I quoted above.

    It’s also possible that one of his “friends” reported him or something like that.

    • @MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      Please explain to me how using Public WiFi is unsafe if the traffic is encrypted with TLS. Unless they somehow installed a keylogger on everyone connected to said Wifi and picked it up from there, the only way this was possible was on some quick text analysis and recognising the IP address from Snapchat

    • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      "A key question in the case was how the message got out, considering Snapchat is an encrypted app.

      One theory, raised in the trial, was that it could have been intercepted via Gatwick’s Wi-Fi network. But a spokesperson for the airport told BBC News that its network “does not have that capability”.

      In the judge’s resolution, cited by the Europa Press news agency, it was said that the message, “for unknown reasons, was captured by the security mechanisms of England when the plane was flying over French airspace”."

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68099669