• GodlessCommie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    It doesnt get much worse than death. Liberals will justify any and every possible action to defend the blue fascist by claiming the red one could be worse. What happened to ‘push him left after the election’

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Oh, you’re going to see just how much worse it can get.

      Are you fucking kidding me?? You think this is as bad as it gets? Read a goddamn history book.

      • GodlessCommie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Liberals are not that good at projecting outcomes, everything they claimed would happen under Trump if he won 2020 has come true under Biden. So I’ll take your projection with a grain of salt

    • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -310 months ago

      I think left to your satisfaction would be little further than most everyone else wants him, tbf. lol You can’t acknowledge any of the progress he’s made though? Even like, a tiny bit?

      Regarding Gaza, btw, they don’t need our glide bombs to commit a genocide. There’s a whole lot of ways to do an ethnic cleansing, so, you can’t necessarily stop it just by stopping the weapons. It’s not that simple.

      We’d have to sanction them or something, that’d probably do it.

      • GodlessCommie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        acknowledge any of the progress he’s made though

        No. Prior to Gaza, though Im very critical of him, I did acknowledge a few things. Once he prioritized additional money/weapons and refused a ceasefire while bypassing Congress to allocate more weapons, despite what Israel was doing, and pledging unwavering support. Any progress prior to that is irrelevant. Shipping containers had a higher priority than the lives of Palestinians,

        they don’t need our glide bombs to commit a genocide

        While true, without access to US weapons, including white phosphorous which is restricted under international humanitarian law, it would be much harder to accomplish.

        • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -210 months ago

          I disagree, I think it would be easier. I think they’d probably starve them all. Nothing short of UN sanctions could stop them.

          People call it a siege, but its not a real one. It could be. Humans require 2000 calories a day, roughly.

          And WP is frequently used in smoke applications, where it is permitted. It’s not completely banned. While I won’t say they aren’t misusing it to cause fear and suffering, it is a common tool employed by armies for use outside of deadly munitions.

          At any rate, thanks for answering. I understand better.