The CIA released another video Monday appealing to Russians disillusioned with the country’s leaders, offering them a way to pass secrets to the American spy agency.

Titled “Why I contacted CIA: the motherland,” the Russian-language video, posted on Telegram and other social media platforms, attempts to connect with Russians’ sense of patriotism and the disparity between soldiers’ making sacrifices on the battlefield and the comfortable lives of the country’s elites.

The CIA posted two similar videos last year on social media.

“We are seeing more outreach from Russians as a result of these videos,” a CIA spokesperson said. “If it weren’t working, we wouldn’t be on video number three.”

  • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2211 months ago

    … that’s great and all, but pretty much anyone can be a social media influencer. How about some actual counter-intelligence work, that most of us couldn’t actually do?

    I wouldn’t mind hearing about some more Russian spies getting caught, if they really want to earn their pay.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      2011 months ago

      It’s not like they’re just sitting there on their arse this whole time. Ukraine is being fed a shit load of intelligence to help support them, for obvious reasons this isn’t going to be publicly announced each time they do.

        • @Cinner@lemmy.worldB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Their counter-intel is fine. This is a public campaign designed to generate awareness and make as many people aware as possible. They see the uprising. HUMINT from thousands of widowed women may give them valuable information that otherwise could’ve slipped past.

          • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -111 months ago

            Fair point. Though I still do not think their “counter-intel is fine”. Ukrainian counter-intel appears strong, but ours is lacking, unless you count the work of journalists. The work of civilians like Christo Grozev should not be necessary though.

            • @Cinner@lemmy.worldB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              You only hear about their failures and campaigns they want you to hear about. Like when Trump gave up info that outed some of our top Russian spies, and like this.

              • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -211 months ago

                I am well aware that much of the work occurs behind the scenes. However, that does not excuse numerous failures. I am not willing to simply give them the benefit of the doubt and my trust, a position that I simply find prudent. They are an agency of my democratic government, and we should pay attention and be critical.

      • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -411 months ago

        I’m saying that very few of our institutions have the resources and experience necessary to fight back against any form of espionage. Our intelligence agencies do, so I would appreciate a pivot from intelligence-gathering and destabilization operations, which are a part of their mission, to counter-intelligence against our rivals, which is also part of their mission. This seems to have been neglected, given how Russian spies have managed to perform assassinations in the west, become Italian admirals and German fintech CEOs, and do on-the-ground surveillance in Ukraine in support of their invasion.

        I am deeply disappointed in our CIA these days. Their intelligence gathering is fine, but they should be protecting us as well.

          • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            Lots of rule 5 violations today. People need to take a step back. Moon phase? Something in the air?

            Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

          • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            Counter-intelligence work does not require one to move to China or Russia when the targets that need detection are not operating in China or Russia.