Middle school removes bathroom mirrors to stop kids from making TikToks::Southern Alamance Middle School in Graham, North Carolina has taken drastic steps to reduce the time kids spend outside of class.

  • @doylio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Why not just ban smartphones in school? There’s ample research now that they’re harmful to teen mental health

          • @Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            For anyone that doesn’t know, Forgotten Weapons YouTube channel is one of the best channels relating to guns. But it’s a historical, educational persepective on guns, mostly guns from WW1,WWII, and anything up until the 1980s, though he does deal with some rare and some modern guns from time to time. Overall it’s a fantastic channel, the main guy Ian breaks down a guns history, mechanics, how it handled in production or war time, he really does his research, so it’s not your typical “I like muh guns big and loud” type of channel, it’s legit informative and educational, 100% check him out if you have the slightest interest in guns and gun history.

      • @space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        They could just watch on the security cameras. I’m pretty sure they exist in every class and parents can access them at any time.

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          There aren’t security cameras in classrooms, at least in the schools I’ve worked. They are in the hallways though. I wasn’t allowed to record my class (despite that being good practice - watching yourself teach!)

    • @AccmRazr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4810 months ago

      I know a few schools in my area tried to institute zero tolerance no phones rule and the screaming from parents was loud enough that they gave up. One of the big sticking points was because of school shootings. Another was that schools have been bad about getting kids on the bus, that kids are getting lost or even ending up in bus depots at the end of the day.

      • @doylio@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1310 months ago

        I think a good middle ground might be to ban smartphones but not phones entirely. If you want your kid to be able to call you, buy them a nokia or something without internet capabilities

        • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3610 months ago

          I mean the real reason is that parents are almost as bad as their kids with their phones. They have become accustomed to texting their children throughout the day.

      • @rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -410 months ago

        There are better tools these days than blanket prohibition.

        The signals that voice and data go over are different from each other, so not all modern cellphone jammers jam the entire spectrum. Some can be set up to allow voice calls over the traditional channels while jamming data. This forces students to use the school’s wifi network for any Internet connectivity, whereupon their connectivity to apps and services can be whitelisted/blacklisted as deemed necessary by system admins.

        Ergo, a system that keeps students off of their smartphones while allowing parental connectivity.

        • @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1210 months ago

          Yeah, because schools have thousands of dollars to spend on high-end cellphone jammers when they can’t even pay their teachers a decent wage.

          • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            810 months ago

            Imagine jamming cell signal then an emergency happens. Oh the liability payout would be massive. And they say schools are underfunded now.

        • Kevin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 months ago

          I feel that might be an issue from 4G onwards, considering VoLTE and VoNR are intended to avoid the use of a separate voice network to their existing data network

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I proposed a Faraday cage once 😂. But running a jammer would be a good way to get the FCC involved (hint: massively illegal). And if you think dealing with the FCC is fun, ask your local ham operator…

          Also they all know how to find proxies or unblocked sites. I watched severely intellectually disabled children teach other out to install VPNs. The smarter ones could install shit like Dolphin and would be playing Pokémon in class.

        • @bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          How do you only allow parent connectivity without allowing most everything else? Would this require schools to build an app specifically for them to allow through and make parents and kids use that? It sounds awful for everyone involved. A mildly determined and clever kid would probably be able to figure out how to circumvent the censorship anyways, and now you’re back at square one but with a bunch of useless infrastructure to maintain.

          • @thejml@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            How many VPNs are running on ports that’d be allowed? Schools can easily restrict wifi to only allow 443 through a MITM proxy and 80 (which firewalls can easily inspect and drop TLS connections.)

            • @scarilog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              You can get VPNs that run over websocket connections.

              You can’t solve behavioural issues purely with technology.

        • JackGreenEarth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -310 months ago

          You’ll be so popular, with your dictator-like censorship of an organisation! How come no one even treats children like people, you wouldn’t find it acceptable to jam the mobile data of adults’ phones. Talk to the kids and encourage them to want to work at school, don’t be autocratic.

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          This but unironically. In my neck of the woods, we are hemorrhaging kids to private or charter. That means losing money. Superintendents and administrators view parents as customers. They don’t want a parent to get pissed and move districts because the dollars follow the students. If education is babysitting - if a teacher allows students to do nothing but watch videos on their phone - parents hear nothing and assume everything is fine. If a teacher is calling home about behavioral issues, or a school has “high” discipline rates, then that becomes a visible issue.

    • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You can’t take them, because the district is worried they’ll get sued if one breaks. Your option is to tell the parent, and the parent will 80% come up with some bullshit excuse or accuse you of targeting their child. I worked one district that had a form we could fill out - after getting caught three times they were supposed to turn the phone in. Never happened.

      Please. Do. Not. Send. Your. Child. To. School. With. A. Smartphone. DONT.

      They are addicted. We’ve given them tech that adults can’t even manage to responsibly use. They don’t know how to be bored or curious. The behavior is just strange - when I’ve been fuck it and just taken a phone - they regress. 15 year olds babbling and throwing tantrums like toddlers.

      • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        Id feel safer sending my kid to school without a smartphone if I wasn’t scared there would be a school shooting or some other reason my kid would need to call me for help. I get the sense a lot of other parents feel that way too.

        My kids are still too young for that but when they are in high school and maybe depending on the middle school I’ll probably start thinking about a phone of some kind.

        Also my kids are bored all the time haha. Taking away their tablet or games is the best punishment most of the time when they argue. We are big on drawing over here though. Hard to stop a kid from drawing lol.

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          In a school shooting situation, cell phones could make things much worse. During my active shooter training, we were told to ask students to turn them off if we were in a shooting. The noise is an obvious danger, but the lines need to be kept clear for communication with emergency response personnel. There would be structured ways that the school would want to communicate with you - they don’t want the chaos of parents showing up to an active scene. I think it would be better to rely on things like the Rave app.

          In other situations, the front office is there. That is the function that they have served for generations. Give the office aides something to do.

          There’s just little reason for students to have smart phones in school. They cannot control themselves. We are asking them to have more self restraint than most adults do. It is not developmentally appropriate and it is harmful.

          • @EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            When I was a kid, there were pay phones so that kids could make calls for when they wanted to be picked up. And we had landline at home so that if you needed to make a call, you could.

            Those things don’t really exist anymore. And now we have phones with apps that monitor medical conditions like diabetes. Let’s single out those kids?

            In other situations, the front office is there. That is the function that they have served for generations. Give the office aides something to do.

            So make the office staff stay after hours so that the kids with after school activities can make a phone call? Yeah, because fuck the school staff, right?

            The horse has already left the gate. You’re not going to get it back.

            • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              504s exist for kids who need them for medical purposes. (Had a diabetic kid - her mom made sure she knew the phone was only for monitoring) While there aren’t pay phones; there is a landline in the office at every school that students will be able to use.

              The office workers are hourly and are already scheduled to stay for at least an hour after school. That’s part of their job.

            • @dankm@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              At my school there was an office phone outside the office that anyone could use. No need to staff it.

      • @skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1910 months ago

        I spent 12 years in American public school during which greater than 70% of the student body had cell or smart phones and 100% of them were successfully banned. If the phone is visible during the school day and you aren’t currently receiving a phone call from the President or from your parents on their way to the hospital, phone goes in the teacher’s desk. You get it back at the end of the day.

        Its not that difficult at all.

      • @notasandwich1948@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        they kinda are Ireland, in primary school mostly but even in secondary school teachers are allowed to take your phone for 3 days if they see you on it

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        What’s the difficulty? If they’re being used they’re out in the open, and if they’re out in the open they can be confiscated.

    • @catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Is there research consensus on when children should be given phones? I would personally be very conservative about it, honestly.

      • @doylio@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        I agree! There’s a campaign pushing to avoid giving kids phones until 8th grade, but I think even that seems a bit too young

    • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Good luck with that, the highschool I went to had a hard enough time getting students to stop vaping at school and during class, smartphones would be a much bigger battle. I graduated in 2019 and I still remember when they would try to crack down on cell phone use, never really affected me that much cause I only ever used my phone during class if I was done with everything but I still saw it go the same way every time. It would always only ever last for a month or two before the teachers just gave up because in the end if someone doesn’t wanna pay attention during class taking away their distraction isn’t gonna make them. They’ll just find some other distraction like talking to people or just zoning out. The problem is school just isn’t engaging and sure you can blame cell phones and social media for making it harder for people to pay attention to things that they don’t wanna do. But that doesn’t mean the solution is to not allow them during school, cause I’ve seen from experience that doesn’t help even if you manage to take away the phones, which already is really hard without impacting students who are following the rules negatively.

    • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If I had a kid I’d straight up tell them do not listen to anyone who tells you you cant keep your phone on you, get in trouble if you must and I’ll take care of the rest. If it becomes a distraction Ill deal with it as a parent, but the last thing I want is a kid caught in any kind of emergency without even a chance to phone help.

      “But the teacher has a phone”

      Okay I dont care. What if the teacher becomes the emergency? What if the teacher steps outside to see what that noise is and doesn’t come back? Not leaving the safety of someone im responsible for in someone elses hands.

      I can teach a kid anything they miss in elementary school. I can’t re-alive the dead.

      • @doylio@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        I said “smartphones” not all phones. If I had a kid, I’d get them a flip phone so they could call or text me, but one without internet capabilities

        • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -10
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Wouldn’t make a mite of difference to me unless they’ve already prooven they’re not responsible enough for a smart phone. Can’t expect them to learn to stay focused if you eliminate all possible distractions, your just setting them up to fail for once they get old enough to make and buy their own distractions.

          • @Bananigans
            link
            English
            510 months ago

            Keep in mind that teaching the students to deal with distractions isn’t the teachers job. They have a list of teaching standards and goals they’re expected to achieve, and they’re expected to provide the most effective environment and instruction available to meet those standards. Eliminating distractions is an extremely obvious and practical way to do that.

              • @Bananigans
                link
                English
                510 months ago

                Apples don’t fall far from the tree I suppose.

                • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -6
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The sign of a man who commented on a chain without reading shit, and got caught. Just slinging some insults, and not even good ones. If I were you, other peoples apples would be the last thing im concerning myself with.

                  • @Bananigans
                    link
                    English
                    310 months ago

                    Sure if it makes you feel better.

      • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Is your kid going to save the day with a cell phone? Do you think in that situation there is not going to be another adult who can call 911?

        When you tell your child “just get in trouble and I’ll take care of the rest” you are telling the child that they don’t have to respect school rules. And having dealt with parents like you, your children turn out to be absolute terrors. (“Im texting my mom!” as you hear the fucking Rizzler song for the sixth time)

        As part of my teaching training, I was in a program where I was not allowed to have my cell phone on me at all. 6 am to 9 pm, for almost two weeks. I survived.

        • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Is your kid going to save the day with a cell phone? Do you think in that situation there is not going to be another adult who can call 911?

          Yes and yes. Not every emergency effects every room or even every person.

          I work in a developmental capacity with people and kids with disabilities. I’ve had clients in classes with their phones in pocket without issue. The Social Workers, Clinicians, Doctors, and other mental health professionals I work with daily prettymuch all do the same for their children, which came up when that wierd ‘national school shooting day’ tiktok trend or whatever happend encouraging it. All of this is coming from a professional place from people who actually have kids of varying ability, who get on just fine like that.

          And I’m not sorry that upsets you. I am sorry you got a class of shitty kids, but if you think that ends if cell phones are in back packs I’d say think back to when you were in school, I don’t imagine there was a lack of horrible kids then either.

          • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            The cell phones do not stay in the backpack. They don’t. Sorry, a fourteen year old does not have the capacity to ignore the absolute barrage of notifications they get.

            Also - every class room I have ever taught in had a phone. The classroom next door has a phone. The lab cabinet has a phone. If it’s really that important that you have 24/7 access, get a dumb phone. They’re cheaper anyway.

            That’s great that you work with kids, but a classroom Is an entirely separate context. I invite you to go substitute in a classroom to get a better understanding about how my job differs from your job.

            • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Few if any of the classrooms I’ve been in have landlines, from my schooling to today, speaking of, I do work in classroom setting frequently with my school age clients, and none of that changes the opinion of other professionals who I interact with and what they do for their kids.