It’s wild.

  • Ann Archy
    link
    fedilink
    -411 months ago

    “Read at a 6th grade level”

    I thought it worked like, when you know how to read, you know how to read, and if you don’t, you won’t.

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      There are different reading levels, but I don’t know a lot about them because I’m not in education.

      You can probably recognize it even if you never thought about it before. “See spot run” or “Green eggs and ham” are very simple texts. Something like “the Great Gatsby” or “the Hobbit” are more complex, and a 2nd grader would struggle to read them even if they technically know how to read.

      Technical manuals, works on a specialist topic, or … my knowledge fails me a little here, but like more complicated novels, may be more advanced. More advanced in vocabulary, sentence structure, and things like symbolism, metaphor, or whatever cool shit House of Leaves was doing.

      I don’t know how legit this site is, but it seems to cover the topic https://www.weareteachers.com/reading-levels/

      I think this is a sample of a text written at the 6th grade level https://www.oxfordonlineenglish.com/english-level-test/reading . I looked it up when that article about how most adults can’t read and comprehend at that level was going around.

      • Ann Archy
        link
        fedilink
        -411 months ago

        The Great Gatsby is shit, and the Hobbit is even worse. It doesn’t affect the situation here, but just wanted to make sure we’re on the same page.

        So reading level is basically a stupidity meter. If you can read this text, you’re a moron. But you’re less of a moron if you can read this text.

        • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I don’t think we’re really on the same page. Literacy and intelligence aren’t the same thing. But if you take nothing else away from this, I think you got the “higher reading levels are more complex” thing. Maybe.

          Also I think you have a typo and one of your can should be can't

          • Ann Archy
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Bold of you to assume I have a point, and that’s not a typo. That’s the duality of existence.