What happens when a school bans smartphones? A complete transformation | US education | The Guardian::Teachers say mobile phones make their lives a living hell – so one Massachusetts school barred them

  • JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1110 months ago

    I’m familiar with the sad fact that many people believe that. Knowledge should never be age restricted. If a kid doesn’t want to learn about, for example, sex, and finds it gross, that’s one thing. An entire society conspiring to keep them from knowing about it till they’re about 11 is quite another.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How about restricting children from driving cars?

      A phone is a tool, not knowledge. Kids can find all the knowledge they want without having phones on them at all times.

      • @asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        I think a lot of comments are thinking about this as a binary, or that it’s actually about if children should have phones or not.

        As an adult, there are plenty of places I’m not allowed to take my phone, or at least must completely power it off. Concerts, court rooms, libraries, hospitals…

        These rules are there only because it disturbs others if my phone rings or I’m talking.

        That applies to schools, too, but even moreso. It also opens the door even wider to cheating in various ways.

        While it is important to try to teach kids to regulate themselves, the fact is that there are still frequent phones going off at concerts and annoying people talking loudly in libraries. Schools are much more serious in nature - it can affect test scores, for example.

        It’s also naive to think that all students / schools can just be taught to make responsible decisions. Many schools, especially inner city ones, are complete disaster areas. It’s hard enough as it is to get the kids to even stop talking, or sit down, or stop assaulting others.

    • @sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes, that’s why I’m completely fine with my kids watching online videos of ISIS prisoners being burnt to death in a dog cage.

      Can I ask if you have kids?

        • @sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          That’s a strange comment. There’s obviously a difference between a 16 year old and a 4 year old (I have both). Are you saying because my 16 year old is curious and gets sent shit by her friends, I shouldn’t try to filter what my 4 year old doing?

          • @Baines@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 months ago

            once you no longer have eyes on them outside your home it is pretty much over

            4 year old is fine, by 5 or 6 good luck unless you are home school helicopter parenting them

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Given how responsibility for much of the violence in the world falls at the feet of the society that is deciding how to censor information from our kids, I find it quite appropriate that they have access to terrorist executions and cat killing videos.

        The US gives few fucks that such videos exist, or that our society was built on massacres and slavery. We just don’t want our kids to know the grim legacy that they’ve been given.

        Considering kids today are going to be middle aged when the climate crisis catches up to us, it raises questions of ethics what people were doing having kids in the first place.