• @CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Off the top of my head, 2. One with no UN seat and one long gone, to be fair, but they still exist and are/were sovereign. You can’t say either turned into totalitarianism.

            Maybe you could say they would have or will, but that’s just your guess. I could say the same thing about liberal democracy and be equally as well supported.

              • @CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Republican Spain and the “Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria” AKA Rojava.

                Republican Spain had some communist factions too, but Rojava is explicitly built around a specific strain of anarchism, and is an “administration” instead of a government. I doubt it looks very anarchist in practice, but that’s neither here nor there, and they’re democratic enough the US has endorsed them in the past to Turkey’s great displeasure.

                • @Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  Republican Spain was a military faction in a Spanish Civil War, not a country.

                  Rojava is Kurdish separatist group, not a country.

                  • @CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Bullshit. They have flags, bureaucracies and a monopoly on the use of force within their territory. I will not argue semantics with you.