• @The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    First: she doesn’t need to say anything specifically or explicitly to be a transphobe actively hostile to the existence of trans people.

    Second: she says things and creates spaces that are very specifically and explicitly hostile to the existence of trans people.

    Third: she associates with and collaborates with people who openly advocate for “reductions in trans people”.

    Honestly I could go through my understanding of her issue, but many people have spoken at great length about why her behavior is harmful. If you’re truly interested seek them out.

    • @jackpot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -110 months ago

      ‘hostile to the existence of trans people’ “reductions in trans people”

      either she genuinely wants genocide or youre being intentuonally misleading, this sounds like hitler describing jews.

        • @jackpot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          thats horrible but if so thats totally illegal and she’d be imprisoned, can you provide a source.

          • apotheotic (she/her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            You can search up “jk Rowling transphobic” or “jk Rowling anti trans” and you’ll find a plethora of sources yourself, this isn’t really a controversial thing. She’s the most well loved transphobe in the world.