Supreme Court action already upending January 6 rioter sentencings, being looked at by Trump defense | CNN Politics
www.cnn.com
The Supreme Court’s recent decision to take a case challenging how the Justice Department prosecutes January 6 rioters has already put on hold several rioters’ sentencings and could affect hundreds more cases—including Donald Trump’s.
    • @AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      8•10 months ago

      The article does a poor job of communicating what the case is about.

      The questions presented: “Did the D.C. Circuit err in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512© (“Witness, Victim, or Informant Tampering”). Which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations. to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence?"[1]

      https://ballotpedia.org/Fischer_v._United_States

      • @Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2•10 months ago

        I know, I know. We’re talking about Trump and his lawyers here, which means nothing makes sense by default.

        But wouldn’t the counting of the votes be a congressional inquiry? I mean it’s literally answering the question of “Who won the election?”.

        Can we go back to the days where a sane Supreme Court would have laughed this entire argument out of the room?

        • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
          4•10 months ago

          I would not call any supreme court “sane” but there was a period where there were some basic standards.