• @Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    It’s tempting to just pile on with “Meta bad” here as most of us believe that for a multitude of good reasons, but how would likely alternatives handle this better? Most of us on Lemmy are strongly in favor of encrypted messaging for example. As the article mentions, that makes monitoring by third parties impossible.

    What if we got all the kids to come to the Fediverse instead of InstaTok? Would-be abusers would most certainly follow. Will Fediverse admins moderate for child safety better than corporate social platforms? Will teenagers want to stay on tightly-moderated servers?

    I don’t think the solutions are as simple as “Meta should stop being shitty and care about the harm it enables”.

    • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 months ago

      I really hate this trend of downplaying valid points by saying “X bad”, as if we need to lay out the argument against X, meta in this case, once again, or else we’re just being idiots arguing blindly. Meta is bad and pointing out that this is just another reason why is fine.

    • @Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      Will Fediverse admins moderate for child safety better than corporate social platforms?

      Sure, you just turn features off.

      Will teenagers want to stay on tightly-moderated servers?

      Maybe not, but at least we could sleep at night. Meta, on the other hand, sleeps at night on a big pile of money.

    • @ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      It’s not our job to create solutions which they should have implemented years ago.

      • @Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Those of us who are actively promoting the Fediverse might, however want to start thinking about how we’re going to handle the same problems as the Fediverse grows.