NegativeNull@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down11cross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comNegativeNull@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
minus-square@cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink20•10 months agoThat is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
minus-square@ItsAFake@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoAhh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
Likely…LIKELY?!
That is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
Ahh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
I was confused on that as well.