@ylai@lemmy.ml to AI@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agoCongress told AI firms should pay for copyrighted contentwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down14
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-linkCongress told AI firms should pay for copyrighted contentwww.theregister.com@ylai@lemmy.ml to AI@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-square@BlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoShould human programmers have to pay creators every time they look at code while they’re learning? I (and most people) have literally copy/pasted code from various websites into my own programs without any sort of payment or notice.
minus-squareMaestrolinkfedilink4•9 months agoIf you copy/pasted without any licensed then you’ve broken copyright yourself. It’s a good way to get into trouble in a professional setting.
Should human programmers have to pay creators every time they look at code while they’re learning? I (and most people) have literally copy/pasted code from various websites into my own programs without any sort of payment or notice.
If you copy/pasted without any licensed then you’ve broken copyright yourself. It’s a good way to get into trouble in a professional setting.
That’s not what AI does, though.
It’s what BlameThePeacock admitted to doing.
Sure, but it has nothing to do with what AI does.