Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

    • @bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      If artists aren’t producing work and just complaining about AI art, who is AI stealing the work of?

      Your argument literally defeats itself.

      • Shurimal
        link
        fedilink
        -51 year ago

        No-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.

        • @bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Your argument seems to be that we should consider the AI to itself be an artist and to grant it the rights of other artists.

          That’s fair.

          But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.

          They also are compensated for their work.

          Is OpenAI putting money in a trust for when their product gains sentience?

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works.

            But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles.

            Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.

    • @foxbat
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      wacom is a company that produces drawing tablets. you know, hardware tools for artists. it is their job to market specifically to artists.