• @General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Allowing Ai to train for free is a direct threat towards creatives

    No. Many creatives fear that AI allows anyone to do what they do, lowering the skill premium they can charge. That doesn’t depend on free training.

    Some seem to feel that paying for training will delay AI deployment for some years, allowing the good times to continue (until they retire or die?)

    But afterward, you have to ask who’s paying for the extra cost when AI is a normal tool for creatives? Where does the money come from to pay the rent to property owners? Obviously the general public will pay a part through higher prices. But I think creatives may bear the brunt, because it’s the tools of their trade that are more expensive and I don’t think all of that cost can be passed on.

    • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      I don’t think lowering the skill level is something we will need to worry about as over time this actually trickles up, A Creative professional trained with AI tools will almost always top a Amateur using the same tools.

      The real issue is Style. If you are an Artist with a very recognizable specific style, and you make your money trough commissions you are basically screwed. Many Artists feature a personal style and while borrowing peoples style is common (disney-esque) it’s usually not a problem because within a unique and diverse human mind it rarely results in unintentional latent copying.